Discrimination/Retaliation
*Starr v. Quiktrip Corporation (10th Cir., March 1, 2018) (affirming judgment in favor of Quiktrip on Starr's Uniformed Services Employment & Reemployment Rights Act: Starr did not show any reversible error.
*Winston v. Ross (10th Cir., February 27, 2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the National Weather Service (Ross): Winston did not establish a prima facie discrimination or retaliation claim, protected activity did not cause the alleged retaliation and the incidents alleged did not amount to adverse employment action)
Wages
Fernandez v. Clean House, LLC (10th Cir., March 2, 2018) (reversing dismissal in favor of Clean House: Fernandez did not need to anticipate statute of limitations defense; in any case, her allegation of willfulness was adequate)
*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. They may be cited, however, for persuasive value under Fed.R.App.P. 32.1 and 10th Cir.R. 32.1.
Labels: Defenses, Discrimination, Procedure, Retaliation, Tenth Circuit, Wages